Pages

Thursday, April 2, 2015

Land of the Long White Cloud, Day Three

Started out in Napier, in Hawkes Bay this morning.  Had a delicious dinner at the "Thirsty Whale.". I was able to try Green Lipped Mussels, which are aqua-farmed on the north coast of South Island. They are big, meaty and delicious.  We decided to drive on the east coast of the mountain range to get to Wellington, since we will be driving on the west side on our way back.  Little did I know that this would include a treacherous winding mountain road towards the south end of North Island prior to arriving Wellington.  It is called "Rimutaka Hill" but a hill, it is not.  Windy and winding with lots of inclines, I was completely focused as I drove our camper van across this challenging road, pulling over as often as I could to allow others to pass.  I was very happy to reach our downtown "camper site," in Wellington that afternoon, rewarding myself with a beer.
Drove close to the mountain named Mt T+56 letters!
 

Meat Pies, great road food!
 
A Pacific Sunrise.  New Zealand is the first country to see the sun everyday.

 
Green Lipped Mussels, a NZ specialty!  Big, meaty and delicious!

 
Didn't need a "post it note" on the dash, as I thought I might!
 
Tanner "framed between the uprights!"

!

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

New Zealand, Day Two, Taupo and Napier



Huka Falls near Taupo

Craters of the Moon Thermal field



Waipunga Falls

Day two, saw us continuing down the "Thermal Explorer Highway," to Taupo, then on to the Pacific coast and Napier, where NZ's wine country begins.  Lake Taupo is absolutely gorgeous and is a huge lake nested in the center of North Island.  This drive through the interior of North Island is called the Thermal Explorer highway because of the geologic nature of the land.  Some areas are very "young" in a geological sense, only 150,000 years old.  From Rotorua on past Taupo are many areas where thermal activities like geysers and steam can be seen emitting from the earth.  We stopped and toured the "Craters of the Moon," in Taupo and because of our time table were not able to see the geyser, nor the Volcanic Valley of Waimangu, though we did stop at the center there and thoroughly enjoyed the drive, after which we were able to reconnect on our scenic drive to Napier.  
This was a drive though plains and mountains, beautifully scenic.  We saw a scenic overlook and pulled in surprised to see the beautiful Waipunga Falls.  We did not know that the scenic overlook was actually overlooking these falls.  It was a delightful discovery.  
 
Views of Lake Taupo
Our trusty "Britz" Explorer

Aotearoa, The land of the Long White Cloud, Day One

Flag of New Zealand

Aotearoa, is the Māori name for New Zealand.  It literally means "The Land of the Long White Cloud.". To the right is the flag of New Zealand which features a depiction of the Southern Cross, which is only visible near or south of the Equator.

The date line on this blog says March 31st, but it is actually the morning of April 1st (no fooling).  When I finally went to sleep last night, it was the end of the longest day for me.  It started Sunday prior to my flight aboard Air New Zealand flight 1 (I like the simple numbering system) that departed LAX at 10 pm Sunday night, March 29th.  After a 13 hour flight we  landed on Tuesday morning, March 31st having crossed the international date line. 
Surprisingly, my travel companion, my son-in-law Tanner and were not weary and after getting checked out in our "camper van," we set out.  Although Auckland is an exciting place, we were south of town near the airport and our goal was to see the country side and arrive in Wellington on the south end of North Island, by Friday to catch the ferry across the Cook Strait for our ultimate destination; the Omaha Fighters Air Show in Blenheim.
My travel companion, my son-in-law, Tanner and I
prepare to head out in our "camper van," after getting
"checked out" in it and watching a video about driving
in NZ (left side of the road, and right side driver's seat.



Mount Maunganui

Some of the extraordinary flora on North Island.

Thermal Waters in Rotorua
 

Saturday, March 28, 2015

New Zealand

Going to New Zealand has long been a "bucket list" item for me.  This year I am finally going to do it.  I had added motivation after coming across an article in an aviation magazine that featured a most unusual air show,  the Omaka Classic Fighters Air show.  I was intrigued immediately, and was surprised to learn that it was held in New Zealand!  The air show takes place in Blenheim, on the northern part of South Island.  It is held every two years.   I missed the show in 2013, so I made plans to attend the show this year, over the Easter week end, APR 3-5th.  
The venue is in the Marlborough region, which stretches across the north-east corner of the South Island of New Zealand. 

Blenheim, a town of some 27,000 sits in the heart of wine country.  

So, off I go.  I plan to arrive in Auckland several days prior to the show and drive the length of North Island on the east side to Wellington.  There I will take the inter island ferry to Picton, which is a short drive from Blenheim. 

I will update this blog as I can with photos and stories of my Kiwi adventure as I can.  

Here is the link to the airshow.

http://www.classicfighters.co.nz/

Friday, March 27, 2015

Pilots and Mental Health

Photo by Juergen Lehle (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) 
The unbelievable events of the recent Germanwings crash has suddenly made an issue of pilots and their mental health.  Even though Captains are required to submit to an FAA medical examination twice a year, they are not required to undergo psychiatric evaluations.

So this begs the question, especially to non pilots and the general air traveling public; "How safe are we from suicidal pilots?  

I can only respond from my point of view and my over thirty years of flying, sixteen as a commercial airline pilot.  I can also say that here in the USA, because of the way that pilots train, there are many ways that a mentally ill pilot will be "weeded out" so to speak.

In the USA, pilot training requires a lot of individual expense unless you trained in the military.  There is a very tough thresh hold to cross to be a successful military pilot. Moreover, peer reviews and constant testing and extremely comprehensive annual medical exams work well to screen any potential problems.  Also, if a pilot is seen as "troubled" by a peer or has been or is going through a tough time in his life, they are grounded by their commanding officer until cleared by medical authorities or sufficient time has passed. Military pilots are, in my humble opinion, the most mentally disciplined individuals that I have ever worked with.  Up until about ten years ago, a majority of airline pilots came from military back grounds.  This has changed as the military has downsized and military pilot production has decreased as commercial airline  pilot demand has increased.

So what about private sector trained pilots?
  
Well, let me say this.  In my experiences, these pilots are technically as talented, if not more so in the ways of commercial civilian flying than some ex-military pilots.  Consider that most of them had to be instructor pilots somewhere along their path to becoming an airline pilot. In teaching, there is much learning.  One becomes quite adept at judging, not just performance and proficiency, but character and mental toughness.  Evaluations are written after each flight, and each student is talked about among instructors.  Recommendations are made and "ups" and "downs" are given.  As a student progresses, he or she is evaluated every step of the way.  Someone with mental health issues is going to eventually be exposed.

Am I saying that it is a perfect system?  No.  Mental health is something that can be developed afterwards or be very subtle.  My point of distinction here is the difference between the way that many European and other countries develop pilots.  Since many other countries (not all, of course) lack a strong general aviation sector like the USA's, many non-USA airlines are forced to have what is referred to as "ab Initio" programs.  This is where they basically take someone who has never flown and start them "from the beginning," hence the term ab initio.  They are usually persons who have expressed an interest in flying and then are tested for their aptitude.  

Andreas Lubitz, the young co-pilot believed to have caused Tuesday's Germanwings plane crash, started flying as a teenager in gliders as part of a club.  In 2007 he graduated from high school and was accepted as a Lufthansa trainee the following year, enrolling at the company's training school in Bremen. Lufthansa said Mr Lubitz had flown a total of 630 hours before Tuesday's fatal crash. 

I am certain that the Lufthansa training is very rigorous.  This is not meant to disparage nor diminish their program.  But, it was all "in house."  There were vested interests in seeing this guy succeed.  A lot of company money was being spent.  MR Lubitz had no skin in the game, so to speak.  His investment was not his hard earned money, but his time, intellect and most likely an obligation to the stay with the company after becoming a first officer. Though realistically, no one really quits a dream job like this in Germany.  If he had spent his own money, time and effort flying in general aviation, building up his time, there would have been ample opportunities for his illness to be discovered.  Yes, perhaps he would have used a Cessna 172 for his suicide, but only himself, or a max of three passengers would have died, not 150 people.  Lufthansa did contract out basic beginning training to schools in the USA, but the advanced training was in Germany.  He was flying as a first officer with 630 total hours!  I don't know how many of those were spent being observed in a training environment,  but it's likely that less than a third were in training as you tend to accumulate your time after getting on bigger equipment flying longer legs.  Today, in the USA, a pilot must have 1500 hours before getting hired with any airline.    
  
I defer the details of mental health issues and suicides to the experts,  but in my observations, young men and women that I have flown with are committed, professional and seeking to advance what they view as the career of a lifetime.  They've invested heavily in their profession and take their job very seriously.  

So, should you be afraid to fly on a non-USA airline?  I still submit that the most dangerous part of flying on a commercial airliner is your drive to the airport.

Friday, August 9, 2013

Experts say stricter FAA rules for pilots too costly, won't improve safety


Source: The Chicago Tribune; Aug. 8, 2013
Tougher commercial pilot training rules that took effect this month will make America's skies safer, federal officials say, but aviation experts and veteran pilots argue that the costly changes are overreaching, off-target and creating crew shortages, all while doing little to improve safety.
The changes, which affect regional carriers and increase the minimum flight time required to be a co-pilot from 250 to 1,500 hours, came in response to a 2009 plane crash in Buffalo, N.Y., that killed 50 people.
The Federal Aviation Administration argues that the tougher qualifications for co-pilots, or first officers, will ensure that pilots have a stronger foundation of aeronautical knowledge and the proper experience to fly for an airline and to fly specific airplane models to which they are assigned.
Independent experts and pilots, however, say skilled aviators are the product of a rigorous, high-quality training program, not the number of hours they log in the cockpit.
"I used to think that flight time was a measure of everything," said Bill Parrot, a retired American Airlines captain who teaches aviation at Lewis University in Romeoville. "I flew with a guy with 10,000 hours in the military who scared the hell out of me. It was a reality check.
"Flight time can mean you survived this far based on luck," he said. "It does not equate to proficiency and certainly not to professionalism."
The pilot shortage resulting from the new rules has prompted some regional carriers, which pay among the lowest pilot salaries in the industry, to offer signing bonuses of $5,000 to $10,000 to the shrinking pool of job-seekers who meet the new minimum standards, airline officials said.
Despite the mandated extra hours, those new hires still might not be ready or possess the aptitude — or as aviators might say, the "right stuff" — to become professional flying aces, according to veteran airline pilots, airline flight instructors and pilot career counselors.
The shortage also comes as many senior pilots working at major airlines are reaching the mandatory retirement age of 65. The retirement wave will open up spaces for captains at regional airlines to cross over to work at major airlines and, in turn, create more openings for captains and first officers at regional airlines, officials said.
One reason for the shortage is the exorbitant cost facing aspiring pilots, many of whom earn a starting salary of $20,000 to $25,000, sometimes less.
Zach Sargent, 21, a student at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Prescott, Ariz., estimated his education will cost at least $250,000 to complete under the new FAA rules. The old regimen could cost many trainees $50,000 to $80,000. The reason he can pursue his career dream is that his grandfather paid for it, he said.
"I got extremely lucky, but a lot of students are pulling out hundreds of thousands of dollars in loans in order to pay it off," said Sargent, of Santa Rosa, Calif., who has accrued about 600 flight hours.
Even with reduced requirements of 1,000 hours for college-educated pilots, the FAA is still "making it a longer process than it was" when he started his flight education, Sargent said while attending the AirVenture air show last week in Oshkosh, Wis. "But I guess you can say that, with more experience, it is a little safer."
Pilots-in-training face the added costs at a time when the industry is ramping up hiring. In the wake of very limited pilot hiring by major airlines over the last five years, United Airlines has slowly increased its hiring, and American Airlines and Delta Air Lines have announced that they will restart hiring in the fall.
According to some projections, as many as 10,000 pilots a year could be hired to keep pace with attrition and meet service expansion plans. A recent study by the University of North Dakota said major airlines will need to hire about 60,000 pilots by 2025.
Compounding the industry's hiring challenge will be a new FAA safety rule taking effect next year that requires more rest time for commercial pilots, to counter chronic fatigue that imperils safety. But it will accelerate the need for even more pilots.
The FAA's enhanced pilot requirements, which the agency estimates will cost the industry and pilots $6.4 billion, took three years to finalize and were challenged by the airline industry and pilot unions much of the way.
The requirements will "help mitigate the risk of a first officer transitioning to captain before he or she is ready," FAA Deputy Administrator Michael Whitaker said at a recent meeting of the Air Line Pilots Association in Washington.
Under the changes, first officers are required to hold an airline transport pilot certificate, which reflects the 1,500-hour requirement. First officers were previously required to have only a commercial pilot certificate, which required 250 hours of flight time.
Many safety experts question the wisdom of raising flight-time requirements, which was the outgrowth of a congressional order in 2010, in response to the 2009 Buffalo crash.
The FAA's Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee had recommended that the 250 hours for co-pilots be increased to 750 hours, along with training enhancements.
The major and regional airlines and the Air Line Pilots Association union supported as few as 500 hours, if they were based on military or academic training.
The Regional Airline Association made the case that a pilot shortage prompted by the new rules could threaten service to about 500 communities in the U.S. that rely exclusively on regional airlines for air service.
The FAA has long maintained that one level of safety exists among the mainline airlines and the regional carriers that share the same skies and runways and provide connections among the hub-and-spoke airports of the U.S. commercial system.
In terms of the frequency of deadly accidents, the data show no statistically significant differences between large airliners flown by veteran pilots who have thousands of hours of experience and regional jets in which the captain is highly experienced but the first officer generally isn't.
Commercial aviation safety overall has never been better in the U.S., the record shows. In 2012, for the third straight year, there were no fatal accidents in the U.S. involving either major or regional airlines, according to the National Transportation Safety Board.
But the 2009 Colgan Air crash elicited widespread concern and fear from Capitol Hill to Main Street. The NTSB investigation exposed a series of fatal mistakes and violations of FAA and company rules by the Colgan crew. The chain of events led to them losing control of the plane after ice accumulated on the plane during a February storm.
Critics of the new FAA rules point out that both pilots had more than 2,000 hours each.
In addition to more flight time, the new FAA regulations require high-altitude training, including weather-induced conditions such as icing. A pilot training in a small aircraft to earn the less-demanding commercial license would not experience icing because small planes are not pressurized and therefore fly at lower altitudes, officials said.
The new rules also call for commercial pilots-in-training to be subjected to more demanding scenarios during simulator flights during which two pilots in the cockpit learn to parcel out duties and help prevent a small problem from becoming a crisis.
But it doesn't take 1,500 hours in the air to achieve proficiency, experts said.
"If done right, you could incorporate this additional training into a 300-hour flight time requirement and get the same benefits. The military accomplishes it with excellent pilot selection and training on highly sophisticated aircraft," said Kit Darby, a onetime Army pilot who later logged more than 24,000 hours as a United Airlines captain.
"To say that 1,500 hours is the solution is simply unenlightened," Darby said. "It takes too much time, costs too much money and leaves the airlines without a supply of pilots over at least the next four years."
Darby, who runs a Georgia-based aviation consulting business, said regional airlines are "flat out of pilots." Airline officials confirm that an increasing number of regional flights are being canceled because of crew shortages.
"If you are breathing and have 1,500 hours, you will get an interview immediately and be hired," he said.
Meanwhile, Congress may have been shortsighted about the impact of the pilot rules on the U.S. economy and the availability of airline service, especially to small communities that are usually the first to lose service when airlines make cuts, some experts said.
"If you take (pilot) crews out of the mix because they don't meet the criteria, you will have to take planes and flights out of service. Smaller communities will be hit first," said Brian Hogan, a vice president with Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty in Chicago, which provides insurance to the aviation industry.
And Darby said requiring the airlines to hire only "pilots who have a MasterCard" to pay for flight hours may "reverse the safety effect in the short run" and make it more difficult for the airlines to weed out bad pilots.
Once hired, many regional airline pilots cannot afford to live in the cities where they are based, so they commute to work and grab a few hours of rest where they can. The long days can catch up with them.
The 24-year-old co-pilot in the Colgan crash, whose salary was less than $17,000 a year, was sleep-deprived at the time of the accident, the NTSB investigation found. The night before the accident, she stayed at her parents' house near Seattle and commuted to work cross-country to her base at Newark, N.J. On her flight as a passenger from Seattle, she told the pilots in the cockpit that the employee lounge at Newark had a couch "with my name on it."
But Tim Brady, dean of the College of Aviation at Embry-Riddle's Daytona Beach campus, said regional airlines should be viewed as a steppingstone to eventually working for the major airlines. Over a lifetime, a commercial pilot will earn more money than an aerospace engineer, Brady said.
In a 30-year career in which an airline pilot flies about 15 days a month, the pilot will earn about $8 million, according to some industry calculations. Today, some airlines are increasing the pay of senior captains by up to 35 percent from what their salaries were just a few years ago, resulting in top salaries averaging $215,000 a year, plus benefits, airline analysts said.
"There is too much whining going on about low salaries at the beginning of a pilot's career," Brady said. "Look at a physician — as a resident they certainly aren't making any money. What we should be looking at is the total lifetime income of a pilot. It's outstanding."

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

The Asiana Crash and Swiss Cheese

     After any airline incident, especially a crash, I am always asked by anyone who knows or finds out what I do for a living about what happened, as if my insight into flying would provide some magic answer.  I am certain that every airline pilot gets asked the same thing.
The bottom line is that you know as much about what happened as I do and I can only speculate as to what happened.  I won't necessarily divulge what my thoughts are.  Also, I will be the last person to throw another pilot under the bus.  There, but for the grace of God go I, I often say.
     As a Navy trained Aviation Safety Officer, I was taught to look at facts with no preconceived notions or agendas.  The facts of this incident are not all known.  They will be eventually.  They have an abundance of resources.  The crew survived, most of the passengers survived and the bulk of the aircraft is available for investigation, unlike the Air France Airbus lost tin the south Atlantic.
S2S     So when I hear people telling me what they think happened, I ask them if they are pilots.  Usually they are not, so I ask them how they are deriving their opinions.  I get some very interesting responses.  Until the investigation is complete and published we really won't know why or how.  In the past, these things were done quietly without public disclosure until it was complete.  Now, there are press conferences detailing every aspect and discovery as a result of the investigation.   Pundits and talking heads all begin to formulate the why and how.  In Naval Aviation, "mishaps," (as they were called) were investigated in relative secrecy.  It wasn't until the "Mishap Report" was published that the investigative board's conclusions were published.  If there was an apparent failure of some part or procedure, typically these things would be scrutinized and airplanes would be immediately grounded or a procedure quickly modified as a result of certain obvious discoveries.
     What I do know is this:  regardless of what and how an accident happened, it will always be the pilot's fault; "pilot error."  Ultimately it comes down to the pilot and his or her ability to fly a good plane correctly or a bad plane safely.  
      It is important to know that pilots, even though they are supposed to be "in control," are often out of control of a lot of things that they rely on.  It is vital that others do their jobs correctly and attentively in order for them to be successful.  Flying and operating an airliner is part of a system that has many checks and balances.  Just as in Naval Aviation (and Air Force too, though I can only speak from my experience), there is a support system for pilots operating aircraft, there is a support system for airline pilots.
     In the safety world, we talk about the "swiss cheese" model.  The Swiss Cheese model of accident causation is a model used in the risk analysis and risk management of human systems, commonly aviation, engineering, and healthcare. It likens human systems to multiple slices of swiss cheese, stacked together, side by side. It was originally propounded by Dante Orlandella and James T. Reason of the University of Manchester (Reason 1990), and has since gained widespread acceptance and use in healthcare, in the aviation safety industry, and in emergency service organizations. It is sometimes called the cumulative act effect.
     The theory is that most accidents can be traced to one or more of four levels of failure: Organizational influences, unsafe supervision, preconditions for unsafe acts, and the unsafe acts themselves. In the Swiss Cheese model, an organization's defenses against failure are modeled as a series of barriers, represented as slices of Swiss cheese. The holes in the cheese slices represent individual weaknesses in individual parts of the system, and are continually varying in size and position in all slices. The system as a whole produces failures when all of the holes in each of the slices momentarily align, permitting (in Reason's words) "a trajectory of accident opportunity", so that a hazard passes through all of the holes in all of the defenses, leading to a failure.
     I won't bore you with more safety theories, but I understand that we all want to know the why and how of the Asiana crash.  Ultimately, the only thing that people will hear about is "pilot error," but I hope that this at least begins to make you aware of the fact that any accident involves more than the "mistakes" of just one or two people, especially if those two people are the pilots.